Subject: Re: cltl2.txt

From: haible (Bruno Haible)
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 94 18:41:36 +0100

Joachim Schrod <[email-masked]>:

> ... the new support for some CLtL2 constructs.
> Is there anything to note concerning these new features?

impnotes.txt mentions every deviation from CLtL2.

> Or may I just change all `no' entries to `yes' for the respective
> X3J13 votes?

Yes. X3J13 votes <30>, <31>, <186> deserve a `yes'.

                    Bruno Haible
                    [email-masked]