Subject: Re: merge-pathnames bug?

From: Sam Steingold <[email-masked]>
Date: 22 Mar 1999 13:10:24 -0500

>>>> In message <[email-masked]>
>>>> On the subject of "Re: merge-pathnames bug?"
>>>> Sent on Mon, 15 Feb 1999 06:05:06 -0800 (PST)
>>>> Honorable Joerg Hoehle <[email-masked]> writes:
 >> 
 >> This doesn't seem to be documented in _impnotes.txt.

It is now. see (tomorrow)
ftp://cellar.goems.com/pub/clisp/impnotes.html#pathmerge

 >> I'd vote for the change too.

I implemented the change under the `-a' (more ANSI CL compliance) flag.
It will be in the tomorrows snapshot.

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://www.goems.com/~sds) running RedHat5.2 GNU/Linux
Micros**t is not the answer.  Micros**t is a question, and the answer is Linux,
(http://www.linux.org) the choice of the GNU (http://www.gnu.org) generation.
Those who don't know lisp are destined to reinvent it, poorly.