Subject: [clisp-list] Re: call-next-method

From: Bruno Haible <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 21:56:32 +0200 (MET DST)

Zbyszek Jurkiewicz wrote on 2000-05-24:
> Would it be hard to change CALL-NEXT-METHOD into a function
> (instead of macro)?  Without it, CLISP is inconsistent with
> ANSI CL and CLtL2, and some programs cannot not be ported
> easily to it.

This is now implemented in the current CVS. Thanks for the suggestion.

Bruno